Source: Allahabad High Court. Why in News? Recently, the Allahabad High Court in the matter of Maa Vindhya Stone Crusher Company v. State of U.P. and Anr., has held that in a civilized society, principles of natural justice ought to be followed in order to maintain rule of law. What was the Background of Maa Vindhya Stone Crusher …
In a historic case, 212 stone crushers were shifted out of Delhi to a 'Crushing Zone' set up in Haryana by an order of the Supreme Court on May 15th, 1992. Emission of more than 1500 tons of dust emitted daily in the atmosphere has been eliminated. ... This matter was taken up in the Supreme Court and vide an historic …
Union of India (Stone Crushing Case), 1992 Supp (2) SCC 85, cases relating to Stone crushing operation in the vicinity of Delhi, wherein the total closure of the operation ordered by Union of India and crusher owner instead of approaching the Supreme Court in the pending matters, filed writ petitions in High Court and obtained interim orders ...
No stone crusher shall operate in the above said area form August 15, 1992 onward. (3) The writ petitions filed by the owners/proprietors of stone crushers in …
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S VASAVI STONE CRUSHER v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on CaseMine.
On 15 September 2017, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court) delivered a judgment in the matter of State of Uttarakhand v Kumaon Stone Crusher deciding the issue of levy of transit ...
- 2 - After hearing learned Senior Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective appellants and the grievances made, it appears that the main grievances are two fold -. 1. The order passed by the Tribunal directing to pay Rs.20,00,000/- by each stone crusher by way of interim compensation; and . 2. That operation of the stone crushers, …
Latest Judgments State of Uttaranchal & Ors. v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher. February 19, 2015. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19445/2004. Shri S.R. Singh, learned senior counsel for the petitioner(s), on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Special Leave Petitions. Print ...
12. On 11.12.2018, after the Supreme Court remand, the NGT passed a fresh order disposing of the O.A. No. 332/2017 whereby the onus was shifted to the State …
Supreme Court of India M.C. Mehta vs Union Of India & Ors on 18 March, 2004 Author: ... Stone crushing sites in Pali : EPCA has inspected the stone crushing sites in the area. ... This is despite conditions in the judgment dated 10th May, 1996 by this Court that the Director Mining and Ecology Haryana would be responsible for mining in …
Get free access to the complete judgment in THE STATE OF HARYANA v. M/S KC STONE CRUSHING CO. on CaseMine.
PER C.L. SETHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER: The assessee is in appeal against the order dated 14.10.2008 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) in the matter of an assessment made under sec.143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) by the Assessing Officer for the Assessment Year 2005-06.
Get free access to the complete judgment in Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U.P v. Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P) Ltd. . on CaseMine. ... Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P) Ltd. . Supreme Court Of India Mar 14, 2000; Subsequent References; CaseIQ (AI Recommendations) Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U.P v. Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher …
13. A reading of Rule 18 itself would indicate that it deals with scenarios of grant of license to stone crushers. Rule 18(v) stipulates that trade/D&O license shall not be granted to a stone crusher unit, if the site is not situated within a distance of 500 metres from a State Highway or National Highway.
Latest Judgments State of Uttaranchal & Ors. v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher. February 19, 2015. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19445/2004. Shri S.R. …
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S. SHRIGONDA STONE CRUSHER v. MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD on CaseMine. ... Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Latest Judgments State of Uttaranchal & Ors. v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher. November 26, 2021. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 19445/2004. Learned counsel …
It held that the character of Forest Produce is not lost by such crushing of the stone. High Court of Uttarakhand has taken a contrary view in its judgment dated 01.07.2004 in Kumaon Stone Crusher (Supra), as noted above. 63. Learned counsel for the writ petitioners have relied on few judgments of this Court which need to be noticed.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 27 July, 2017 ... No(s). 19445/2004 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-07-2004 in WP No. 1124/2001 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) STATE OF UTTARANCHAL & ORS. ...
Get free access to the complete judgment in Shree Channabasaveshwara Stone Crusher v. State Of Karnataka on CaseMine.
3. The matter pertains to two stone crushers operated by the respondent nos. 4 and 5 in Village Fatta Bangar at Haldwani in Nainital District. The contention of the appellant (based on the report dated 7th April, 2014 of the Halka Patwari) is that the two stone crusher units are operating in violation of the statutory environmental
Get Solution & Price Right Now! leave your message here, we'll send you an Email immediately. * *
crushing of the stone. High Court of Uttarakhand has taken a contrary view in its judgment dated 01.07.2004 in Kumaon Stone Crusher (Supra), as noted above. 62. Learned counsel for the writ petitioners have relied on few judgments of this Court which need to be noticed. Reliance is placed on Two Judge Bench in
Get free access to the complete judgment in Anjani Stone Crusher... v. State Of Andhra Prad... on CaseMine.
This Court in CST v. Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P...2(e-1) of the U.P Act appears to be similar to the definition under consideration.7. In view of the judgment of this Court in Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P) Ltd...have taken, the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Kher Stone Crusher v. G.M, District Industries Centre (1990) 79 …
Get free access to the complete judgment in State Of Uttarakhand And Others v. New Taral Stone Crusher . on CaseMine.
In this petition, the petitioner, inter alia, seeks writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to collect the tax from the petitioner for private land/road where the stone crusher has been installed and to collect the toll tax as per Section 4 of Levy of Toll Tax Act read with Section 2(i) of Levy of Toll Rules from the post where the …
Order. 1. Mr M.C Mehta — environmentalist lawyer — has filed this public interest petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Haryana Pollution Control Board (the Board) to control the pollution caused by the stone crushers, pulverisers and mine operators in the Faridabad-Balabgarh area.
(1) The order passed in writ petition no. 5768/2008 (m/s, anu stone crusher v. Bank of india and others) will also govern the disposal of wrti petition no. 5770/2008 (M/s. Bajaj Stone Crusher v. Bank of India and others) and writ petition no. 5781/2008 (m/s. Saroj stone crusher v. Bank of india and others).
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:167336-DB Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25003 of 2023 Petitioner :- Maa Vindhya Stone Crusher Company Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Udit Chandra,Nitesh Patel Counsel for Respondent :- CSC